How We Create Content

Every guide, tutorial, and reference article currently published on AI JSON is created and reviewed by the AI JSON Team, who brings real-world development experience and oversees all technical content. We leverage AI tools to assist with research, drafting efficiency, and editing — but every current article undergoes human review, code verification against the actual tool implementation, and editorial oversight before publication. Quality and accuracy come from this combination of developer expertise and AI-assisted workflow, not from fully automated generation.

Our content creation principles:

A note on our history: Between April and May 2026 we briefly ran a scheduled automation workflow that generated blog and news articles from RSS feeds with minimal human review. This produced a large volume of low-quality, near-duplicate content that Google flagged as programmatic SEO. We shut down the automation (the workflow file remains in our repository, disabled, for transparency), removed the affected articles, and rebuilt our editorial process around the human-reviewed standard described on this page. See our CI & quality checks writeup for the full story.

How We Review Content

Before any article is published, it goes through a 3-step review process to ensure technical accuracy, structural integrity, and user experience quality:

  1. Code Verification: Every code example, JSON snippet, and tool reference is tested against the live tool on aijsons.com. Outputs are verified for correctness, and edge cases are validated. No code is published without being run first.
  2. Internal Link Check: All internal links (cross-references to other tools, related articles, documentation pages) are checked to ensure they resolve correctly and point to the intended destination. Broken links are fixed before publication.
  3. Mobile Preview: The article is previewed on mobile, tablet, and desktop viewports to verify responsive layout, code block readability, and overall reading experience. Formatting issues are corrected before the final publish.

This 3-step process is applied to every new article and every significant content update. Minor typographical fixes may skip full mobile review at the maintainer's discretion.

How We Correct Errors

We take content accuracy seriously. If an error is discovered — whether reported by a user or identified during our own review — we commit to the following:

Found an error? Please let us know — we appreciate community feedback and take every report seriously.

Contact & Feedback

Questions about our editorial standards? Suggestions for content improvements? We welcome your feedback.

Visit the Contact page to reach out directly or report content issues.

Back to About